The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning on Emotional Creativity among High School Students

Authors

    Fatemeh Mirsharif Department of General Psychology, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran
    Khatereh Ebrahimian * Department of General Psychology, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran. khatereh.ebrahimian996@gmail.com
    Mahnaz Sanjari Department of Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychology, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
    Parisa Eshraghi Department of Psychology, Feyz-al-Islam Non-profit Institute, Isfahan, Iran.
    Arezoo Azimnohasi Department of Clinical Psychology, Andimeshk Branch, Islamic Azad University, Andimeshk, Iran.

Keywords:

AI-based learning, Emotional creativity, Novelty, Effectiveness/Authenticity, High school students

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the effect of artificial intelligence-based learning on emotional creativity among high school students. Methodologically, this study was quasi-experimental and used a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population consisted of male high school students who were studying during the 2024–2025 academic year. After initial screening using the Emotional Creativity Scale, 30 students who had obtained lower scores in emotional creativity were selected and randomly assigned to an experimental group and a control group, with 15 participants in each group. The experimental group participated in an artificial intelligence-based learning program over eight 90-minute sessions, whereas the control group received no intervention during this period. The research instrument was Averill’s Emotional Creativity Scale, and the data were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analysis of covariance. The results of the multivariate analysis of covariance showed that, after controlling for the effect of pretest scores, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the linear combination of the components of emotional creativity; specifically, Pillai’s trace for the group variable was 0.746, with F = 37.33, p = 0.001, and an effect size of 0.746. The results of the univariate analyses also indicated that artificial intelligence-based learning had a significant effect on increasing the novelty component; the adjusted mean of novelty was 86.24 in the experimental group and 70.05 in the control group, and the group effect was statistically significant, F = 50.66, p = 0.001, η² = 0.664. In addition, for the effectiveness/authenticity component, the adjusted mean was 100.31 in the experimental group and 82.44 in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was reported to be significant, F = 45.16, p = 0.001, η² = 0.638. Based on the findings, the purposeful and ethical use of artificial intelligence tools can be considered a novel approach to strengthening the creative and emotional aspects of learning among students. However, due to the limited sample size, the use of a self-report instrument, and the absence of a follow-up phase, the results should be interpreted with caution.

References

Alzoubi, A. M. A., Al-Qudah, M. F., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F. A., & Alfnan, A. A. (2021). The predictive ability of emotional creativity in creative performance among university students. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008876

Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 331-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00058

Averill, J. R., & Thomas-Knowles, C. (1991). Emotional creativity. In International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 269-299). Wiley. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247807746_Emotional_Creativity_Alexithymia_and_Styles_of_Creativity

Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A. T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216

Li, P. H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2025). AI, brain, and child: Navigating the intersection of artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and child development. AI, Brain and Child, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00004-4

Luo, W., He, H., Liu, J., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Zhou, Y., & Li, H. (2024). Aladdin’s Genie or Pandora’s Box for early childhood education? Experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of ChatGPT. Early Education and Development, 35(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2214181

Oriol, X., Amutio, A., Mendoza, M., Da Costa, S., & Miranda, R. (2016). Emotional creativity as predictor of intrinsic motivation and academic engagement in university students: The mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243

Rong, J., Terzidis, K., & Ding, J. (2024). Kids AI design thinking education for creativity development. Archives of Design Research, 37(3), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2024.07.37.3.119

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049

Weng, W., & Zhang, X. (2024). In the era of artificial intelligence, how to cultivate students’ creativity. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education (NMDME 2024),

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Submitted

2026-03-30

Revised

2026-05-10

Accepted

2026-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mirsharif, F., Ebrahimian , K. ., Sanjari, M., Eshraghi, P. ., & Azimnohasi, A. . (1405). The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning on Emotional Creativity among High School Students. Longevity, 1-15. https://quarterlylongevity.com/index.php/longevity/article/view/84

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.